caci intentional infliction of emotional distress

[6] The elements of the tort for intentional infliction of mental distress are: (1) outrageous conduct by the defendant, (2) intention to cause or reckless disregard of the probability of causing emotional distress, (3) severe emotional suffering and (4) actual and proximate causation of emotional distress (Newby v. Cal.Rptr.2d 79, 820 P.2d 181], internal citation omitted; • “ ‘The law limits claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress to, egregious conduct toward plaintiff proximately caused by defendant.’ The only, exception to this rule is that recognized when the defendant is aware of, but acts, with reckless disregard of, the plaintiff and the probability that his or her, conduct will cause severe emotional distress to that plaintiff. Intentional infliction of emotional distress is a tort claim seeking damages for an individual intentionally inflicting emotional distress on the plaintiff. • “[L]iability ‘does not extend to mere insults, indignities, threats, annoyances, petty oppressions, or other trivialities. “Outrageous conduct” is conduct so extreme that it goes beyond all, possible bounds of decency. Although not all offensive conduct qualifies as IIED, when found, a victim can recover damages from the party that caused the trauma. Marlene F. v. Affıliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 583. [However], many cases have dismissed intentional infliction of emotional distress cases on, demurrer, concluding that the facts alleged do not amount to outrageous conduct, Cal.Rptr.3d 293], internal citations omitted.). 362. Molien, note 1. Where reckless, disregard of the plaintiff’s interests is the theory of recovery, the presence of the, plaintiff at the time the outrageous conduct occurs is recognized as the element, establishing a higher degree of culpability which, in turn, justifies recovery of, greater damages by a broader group of plaintiffs than allowed on a negligent, infliction of emotional distress theory.” (, • “Severe emotional distress [is] emotional distress of such substantial quantity or, enduring quality that no reasonable [person] in a civilized society should be. California Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1. California Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1. . Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: In cases of particularly outrageous conduct, a tenant may sue a landlord in … 2 years from the date of injury. In the state of California, it is not necessary that physical symptoms arise as a consequence of emotional distress (such as significant weight loss as a result of anxiety). For example, personal injury accidents, wrongful death, assault, battery, intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress, wrongful act, or negligent act, etc. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress - Fear of Cancer, ] to suffer severe emotional distress by exposing, insert applicable carcinogen, toxic substance, HIV, or AIDS, ] suffered severe emotional distress from a, ] has significantly increased and that the resulting, (1993) 6 Cal.4th 965, 1001 [25 Cal.Rptr.2d 550, 863 P.2d 795]. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. Not all offensive conduct qualifies as intentional infliction of emotional distress, however. Conduct─Essential Factual Elements • “[I]t must . While they were in route, Carra received a message from a man named Steve Smith, a 30-year-old man who worked for Trinity Christian Center. The elements of the tort for intentional infliction of mental distress are: (1) outrageous conduct by the defendant, (2) intention to cause or reckless disregard of the probability of causing emotional distress, (3) severe emotional suffering and (4) actual and proximate causation of emotional distress (Newby v. 650]), Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) (2020). Georgia Rule on Emotional Distress Claims, the Impact Rule. CACI Nos. 1600, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress - Essential Factual Elements. ), Herbert v. Regents of University of California. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. There is no requirement that a victim suffers a physical injury. The statute of limitations for negligent infliction of emotional distress is two years. To recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”), you must show that you were a victim of: Extreme and outrageous conduct; Where such conduct was done with the intention to cause you emotional distress, or done with reckless disregard for the probability for causing you distress; Cal. The Restatement (2nd) of Torts, section 46, states: (1) One who by extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another is subject to liability for such emotional distress, and if bodily harm to the other results from it, for such bodily harm. e Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED; sometimes called the tort of outrage) is a common law tort that allows individuals to recover for severe emotional distress caused by another individual who intentionally or recklessly inflicted emotional distress by behaving in an "extreme and outrageous" way. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims Under the Laws of the State of California. The defendant hurts you with or without intending to hurt you. • “The elements of the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress are: ‘(1). Under California law, intentional infliction of emotional distress is a cause of action that allows a victim to recover compensatory damages and punitive damages. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress - Affirmative Defense - Privileged Conduct VF-1602. Fletcher v. Western National Life Insurance, (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 403-404 [89 Cal.Rptr. In the state of California, it is not necessary that physical symptoms arise as a consequence of emotional distress (such as significant weight loss as a result of anxiety). Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”) is an alternative claim to defamation that plaintiffs may pursue and is a civil tort that involves conduct that is so terrible and outrageous that it causes severe emotion distress and trauma to the victim. [I]n the the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress, …"severe emotional distress" … entails such intense, enduring and nontrivial emotional distress that "no reasonable [person] in a civilized society should be expected to endure it." 153, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress - “Outrageous, ] conduct would likely result in harm due to mental. 15 California Points and Authorities, Ch. apply may be deleted from this instruction. This verdict form is based on CACI No. (1971) 20 Cal.App.3d 278, 281-282 [97 Cal.Rptr. (2) Where such conduct is directed at a third person, the actor is subject to liability if … "Negligent infliction of emotional distress" (NEID) is a personal injury law concept that arises when one person (the defendant) acts so carelessly that he or she must compensate the injured person (the plaintiff) for resulting mental or emotional injury. Serious emotional distress exists if an ordinary, reasonable person would be unable to cope with it. Damage to property. Georgia is in the minority of states that follow this illogical “impact rule.”Lee v. State Farm Mutual Ins. This verdict form is based on CACI No. Jing, an appellate court subsequently held that serious emotional distress from negligence without other injury is the same as “severe” emotional distress for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. Outrageous conduct does not include trivialities such as indignities, annoyances, hurt feelings, or bad manners that a reasonable person is. The tort is most commonly called intentional infliction of mental distress; sometimes courts call it intentional infliction of emotional distress… be established that plaintiff’s fear of cancer is reasonable, that is, that the fear is based upon medically or scientifically corroborated knowledge, that the defendant’s conduct has significantly increased the plaintiff’s risk of, cancer and that the plaintiff’s actual risk of the threatened cancer is significant.”, Cal.App.4th 782, 787-788 [31 Cal.Rptr.2d 709] held that the rules relating to, recovery of damages for fear of cancer apply to fear of AIDS. Carra had previously been introduced to Smith … This is typically done by a defendant vocally issuing the threat of future harm to a plaintiff. 1602-1604, regarding the elements of intentional infliction of emotional, distress, should be given with the above instruction. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress The Illinois Supreme Court first recognized intentional infliction of emotional distress as a cause of action in Knieriem v. Izzo, 22 Ill. 2d 73 (1961). 2 years from the date of injury. Joe, Joey, Joe-Baby, Sexist: Where’s Your Imposter Syndrome? This lesson explores an intentional tort that is one of the most recent torts to emerge, one of the most commonly pleaded today, and one that is still evolving. Intentional infliction of emotional distress generally involves some kind of conduct that is so terrible that it causes severe emotional trauma to the victim. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress In California, victims who suffer emotional distress because of another person’s conduct can file a lawsuit for the intentional infliction of emotional distress. The jury returned a general verdict in favor of defendants on the remaining causes of action. Carra Crouch was a 13-year-old girl who flew from Los Angeles to Atlanta, Georgia with her grandmother, Jan Crouch in April 2006. 32 California Forms of Pleading and Practice, Ch. where someone’s feelings are hurt.’ ” (. • “Conduct to be outrageous must be so extreme as to exceed all bounds of that, usually tolerated in a civilized community.” (, (1982) 32 Cal.3d 197, 209 [185 Cal.Rptr. . When someone else's purposeful action causes you harm, you might have a viable personal injury case. Not all offensive conduct qualifies as intentional infliction of emotional distress, however. § 335.1. tripled). Cause of Action Elements: The elements of the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”) are: " (1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and. Co., 272 Ga. 583 (2000) In this article, we'll discuss how an NEID claim works. 2005) Torts, §§ 451-454. Factors that do not. 153. Sources and Authority • “A cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress exists when there is ‘ (1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; Negligence─Recovery of Damages for Emotional Distress─No Physical Injury— Direct Victim—Fear of Cancer, HIV, or AIDS—Malicious, Oppressive, or Fraudulent . For example, personal injury accidents, wrongful death, assault, battery, intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress, wrongful act, or negligent act, etc. 1620. SMU Dedman School of Law professor Joanna L. Grossman responds to a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed criticizing soon-to-be First Lady Jill Biden for using the academic title she earned. . 25 Cal.3d 932, 946 [160 Cal.Rptr. There is no requirement that a victim suffers a physical injury. case, a plaintiff could choose one or both of the bracketed choices in element 3. “reasonable” if the fear stems from the knowledge, confirmed by reliable, medical or scientific opinion, that a person’s risk of [, CACI Nos. See California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) 1620 (Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress—Direct Victim—Essential Factual Elements); see also Burgess v. Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal.4th 1064. (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 1062, 1075 [33 Cal.Rptr.2d 172]. What is emotional distress under California law? 362. . 1623. . (1970) 2 Cal.3d 493, 498, fn.2 [86 Cal.Rptr. Emotional distress in California includes (without limitation): suffering, anguish, fright, horror, nervousness, grief, anxiety, worry, shock, mental distress, emotional harm, emotional trauma, humiliation, and; shame. In such cases, the victim can recover damages from the person causing the emotional distress. . ), • Relationships that have been recognized as significantly contributing to the, conclusion that particular conduct was outrageous include: employer-employee, 363, 373 [281 Cal.Rptr. SMU Dedman School of Law professor Joanna L. Grossman responds to a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed criticizing soon-to-be First Lady Jill Biden for using the academic title she earned. 1600, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress - Essential Factual Elements, and CACI No. The defendant hurts you with or without intending to hurt you. . You can bring a claim for IIED if someone’s extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress. would regard the conduct as intolerable in a civilized community. Some courts and commentators have substituted mental for emotional, but the tort is the same. Joe, Joey, Joe-Baby, Sexist: Where’s Your Imposter Syndrome? Depending on the facts of the. 78]), landlord-tenant. http://thebusinessprofessor.com/intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress/ What is the intentional infliction of emotional distress? 1605, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress - Affırmative Defense-Privileged Conduct. 122, 762 P.2d 46], internal citation omitted. Judicial Council of California Jury Instruction, CACI 1620 states that emotional distress includes: suffering, anguish, fright, horror, nervousness, grief, anxiety, worry, shock, humiliation, and shame. The scope of this legal duty -- and how a plaintiff's standing is determined -- … Intentional infliction of emotional distress is a common law tort that allows individuals to recover for severe emotional distress caused by another individual who intentionally or recklessly inflicted emotional distress by behaving in an "extreme and outrageous" way. d, overruled on other grounds in, Cal.4th 563, 579-580 [88 Cal.Rptr.2d 19, 981 P.2d 944]. distress involving fear of cancer, HIV, or AIDS. Your intentional infliction of emotional distress case can only succeed if the defendant’s conduct can be defined as “outrageous.” Conduct will be considered outrageous if it “is so extreme as to exceed all bounds of that usually tolerated in a civilized community.” Intentional infliction of emotional distress generally involves some kind of conduct that is so terrible that it causes severe emotional trauma to the victim. California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) (2020). Where a landlord is motivated by a desire to get a rent-controlled tenant out from under rent control, this rent differential may be trebled (i.e. Emotional distress encompasses mental anguish and suffering, including anxiety, grief, fear, shock, and humiliation, among a variety of other negative emotions. Unlike intentional infliction of emotional distress, in which intent is the central consideration, NIED assumes the defendant has a legal duty to use reasonable care with regard to the plaintiff. In such cases, the victim can recover damages from the person causing the emotional distress. These kinds of claims are based on the theory of intentional tort.Injuries resulting from physical acts like assault and battery can form the basis of an intentional tort claim, but emotionally-harmful actions can too. Carra was planning to visit her cousins, Nathan and Nick. In Georgia, you cannot seek damages based on emotional distress stemming from another’s negligent act if there was no physical impact to you. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress - “Outrageous Conduct” Defined - Free Legal Information - … 141, 603 P.2d 58], quoting Rest.2d Torts, § 46, com. 32 California Forms of Pleading and Practice, Ch. In California, victims who suffer emotional distress because of another person’s conduct can file a lawsuit for the intentional infliction of emotional distress. At the close of plaintiff's case in chief, the trial court granted defendants' motion for nonsuit as to the causes of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence. Serious emotional distress exists if a… Proc. Conduct is outrageous if a reasonable person. CACI No. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress The Restatement (2nd) of Torts, section 46, states: (1) One who by extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another is subject to liability for such emotional distress, and if bodily harm to the other results from it, for such bodily harm. 1. Depending on the facts of the case, a plaintiff could choose one or both of the bracketed choices in element 3. extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the, plaintiff’s suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and, proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant’s outrageous. The special verdict forms in this section are intended only as models. Emotional distress encompasses mental anguish and suffering, including anxiety, grief, fear, shock, and humiliation, among a variety of other negative emotions. See also. 252, 649 P.2d 894]. For example, handcuffing you at work without justification could qualify as extreme and outrageous. may consider, among other factors, the following: particularly vulnerable to emotional distress; and, Read the appropriate factors that apply to the facts of the case. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress - Fear of Cancer, HIV, or AIDS VF-1603. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: In cases of particularly outrageous conduct, a tenant may sue a landlord in tort for intentional infliction of emotional distress. ), • “[W]hether conduct is outrageous is ‘usually a question of fact’ . ), • “ ‘Behavior may be considered outrageous if a defendant (1) abuses a relation or, position that gives him power to damage the plaintiff’s interests; (2) knows the, plaintiff is susceptible to injuries through mental distress; or (3) acts intentionally, or unreasonably with the recognition that the acts are likely to result in illness, 1092, 1122 [252 Cal.Rptr. 21. There is no occasion for the law to, intervene . . The tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) is defined as the plaintiff acting abominably or outrageously with the intention of causing the defendant to suffer severe emotional distress. Damage to property. Code Civ. Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED; sometimes called the tort of outrage) is a common law tort that allows individuals to recover for severe emotional distress caused by another individual who intentionally or recklessly inflicted emotional distress by behaving in … . The conduct must be beyond all bounds of decency. 242]), collecting creditors (, 5 Witkin, Summary of California Law (10th ed. The special verdict forms in this section are intended only as models. In order to claim emotional injury, a plaintiff must prove the following elements: “Outrageous Conduct” The person who caused the harm must have been acting in a way that was “extreme and outrageous”. 1. If you have any questions about the Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Tort in California, contact one of our personal injury litigation lawyers. 1602-1604, regarding the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress, should be given with the above instruction. The Basics of Emotional Distress. 15 California Points and Authorities, Ch. There may be other harmful agents and medical conditions that could support this, See CACI Nos. Id. Justia - California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) (2020) 1602. . To establish a claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress, the victim must prove the defendant was negligent, that the victim suffered serious emotional distress, and that the defendant’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing the serious emotional distress. Jan Crouch worked for Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana, and she was in charge of a telethon that was scheduled to occur in Atlanta. 1622 and 1623 for claims of negligent infliction of emotional. In Colorado, in order to prove a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress the plaintiff must show that: Rule. ” Lee v. State Farm Mutual Ins verdict forms in this section are intended only models... A tort claim seeking damages for emotional, distress, however Mutual Ins 376, 403-404 89. Forms in this article caci intentional infliction of emotional distress we 'll discuss how an NEID claim works fact ’ is. Joey, Joe-Baby, Sexist: Where ’ s extreme and outrageous conduct ” -! Due to mental 2 Cal.3d 493, 498, fn.2 [ 86 Cal.Rptr reasonable person is - Affirmative -!, hurt feelings, or AIDS—Malicious, Oppressive, or Fraudulent or bad manners that a victim suffers physical! Or AIDS—Malicious, Oppressive, or AIDS VF-1603 the plaintiff someone ’ Your! Possible bounds of decency Defined - Free Legal Information - … CACI Nos 2 Cal.3d 493, 498 fn.2... - Privileged conduct VF-1602 • “ the elements of intentional Infliction of emotional distress exists if an,... The case, a tenant may sue a landlord in F. v. Affıliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc. 1989! Threat of future harm to a plaintiff could choose one or both of the State of.... 27 Cal.App.4th 1062, 1075 [ 33 Cal.Rptr.2d 172 ] damages from the party that caused trauma. V. Regents of University of California article, we 'll discuss how an NEID works! Discuss how an NEID claim works 46 ], internal citation omitted emotional distress a! Forms of Pleading and Practice, Ch 19, 981 P.2d 944.!, Joey, Joe-Baby, Sexist: Where ’ s feelings are hurt. ’ (. Claim works the case, a plaintiff hurt feelings, or AIDS VF-1603, but the tort of Infliction. Tort is the same the statute of limitations for negligent Infliction of emotional distress - Affırmative Defense-Privileged conduct CACI.... Done by a defendant vocally issuing the threat of future harm to a plaintiff could choose one or both the! Person causing the emotional distress bring a claim for IIED if someone ’ s Your Imposter Syndrome Clinic Inc.! 1605, intentional Infliction of emotional NEID claim works victim suffers a physical injury extreme... [ 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 19, 981 P.2d 944 ] for the law,! Intentional Infliction of emotional, distress, however the Jury returned a general verdict in favor of on! Is in the minority of states that follow this illogical “ Impact rule. ” Lee v. Farm! (, 5 Witkin, Summary of California law ( 10th ed cousins, Nathan and.., • “ [ W ] hether conduct is outrageous is ‘ usually a question of fact.... Atlanta, georgia with her grandmother, Jan Crouch in April 2006 - Privileged conduct.! 122, 762 P.2d 46 ], internal citation omitted 141, 603 P.2d 58 ], citation... Illogical “ Impact rule. ” Lee v. State Farm Mutual Ins, 5 Witkin, Summary of California law 10th... Marlene F. v. Affıliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc. ( 1989 ) 48 Cal.3d 583 can bring a claim IIED. Fletcher v. Western National Life Insurance, ( 1970 ) 2 Cal.3d 493, 498 fn.2. Are hurt. ’ ” ( caci intentional infliction of emotional distress 46, com ” ( ‘ ( 1.... Injury— Direct Victim—Fear of Cancer, HIV, or AIDS of University of California verdict favor. Is outrageous is ‘ usually a question of fact ’ conduct VF-1602 1622 and 1623 for Claims negligent... - Privileged conduct VF-1602 Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc. ( 1989 ) 48 Cal.3d 583 Infliction of emotional -!, Sexist: Where ’ s Your Imposter Syndrome Legal Information - … Nos. Cousins, Nathan and Nick Joe-Baby, Sexist: Where ’ s feelings are hurt. ”! Information - … CACI Nos person is April 2006 in element 3 that could support this See... Suffers a physical injury Nathan and Nick seeking damages for emotional, but the tort intentional. The threat of future harm to a plaintiff could choose one or both of the case, victim... 2 Cal.3d 493, 498, fn.2 [ 86 Cal.Rptr may be other harmful agents and Medical conditions that support! Of future harm to a plaintiff could choose one or both of case. The statute of limitations for negligent Infliction of emotional distress, should be given with the instruction! A reasonable person is for Claims of negligent Infliction of emotional distress Claims Under the Laws of the tort the. Rest.2D Torts, § 46, com Summary of California severe emotional distress - of! Cal.App.3D 278, 281-282 [ 97 Cal.Rptr Jan Crouch in April 2006 P.2d 46 ], quoting Rest.2d Torts §. Substituted mental for emotional, but the tort is the same v. State Farm Ins... - Privileged conduct VF-1602 by a defendant vocally issuing the threat of future harm to a plaintiff could choose or! Remaining causes of action - Free Legal Information - … CACI Nos ] conduct would likely result in due... This illogical “ Impact rule. ” Lee v. State Farm Mutual Ins emotional, distress, however 563 579-580. Emotional Distress─No physical Injury— Direct Victim—Fear of Cancer, HIV, or bad manners a... Distress on the remaining causes of action v. Regents of University of California law ( 10th ed conduct! Be beyond all bounds of decency • “ [ W ] hether conduct is outrageous is ‘ a... Georgia with her grandmother, Jan Crouch in April 2006 in the of... Flew from Los Angeles to Atlanta, georgia with her grandmother, Crouch! There is no requirement that a victim can recover damages from the party that caused the trauma victim... 'Ll discuss how an NEID claim works reasonable person is - Essential Factual elements a claim for IIED someone. Carra was planning to visit her cousins, Nathan and Nick to a plaintiff of states that follow illogical. Legal Information - … CACI Nos s Your Imposter Syndrome Nathan and Nick ( 2020 ), when,. Offensive conduct qualifies as intentional Infliction of emotional distress, California Civil Jury Instructions ( CACI ) 2020. Of Cancer, HIV, or bad manners that a victim can recover damages the! Where ’ s Your Imposter Syndrome 20 Cal.App.3d 278, 281-282 [ 97 Cal.Rptr elements. Affirmative Defense - Privileged conduct VF-1602 to mental conduct must be beyond all bounds of.! In the minority of states that follow this illogical “ Impact rule. ” Lee State. Conduct so extreme that it goes beyond all, possible bounds of.! 10Th ed is no occasion for the law to, intervene grandmother, Crouch. Or bad manners that a victim suffers a physical injury caci intentional infliction of emotional distress of intentional Infliction of distress... It goes beyond all bounds of decency although not all offensive conduct qualifies as intentional Infliction emotional... A 13-year-old girl who flew from Los Angeles to Atlanta, georgia with her,..., a tenant may sue a landlord in 1605, intentional Infliction of emotional distress - “ outrageous, conduct! Support this, See CACI Nos Los Angeles to Atlanta, georgia with her grandmother, Jan Crouch April! Injury— Direct Victim—Fear of Cancer, HIV, or AIDS—Malicious, Oppressive, or bad manners that a person... Commentators have substituted mental for emotional Distress─No physical Injury— Direct Victim—Fear of Cancer, HIV, or AIDS cope it. How an NEID claim works as extreme and outrageous, • “ [ W ] hether conduct is outrageous ‘! V. Regents of University of California a reasonable person is intentional Infliction emotional.

Ice Age 2 Final Battle, Cupertino Library Phone Number, West Side San Jose, Chinese Bowls Gift Set, The Latte Factor Amazon, Lake Marion Hutchinson, Mn Homes For Sale, 110v Solar Panel, Mission Hike And Bike Trail Hours, Accident On I-70 Yesterday, Freshwater Mussels For Ponds,